ATTEMPT OF CONSIDERIG OF CULTURAL AND HISTORICAL PARADIGMS IN THE WORKS OF THE STRUGATSKY BROTHERS («ESCAPE ATTEMPT» , «HARD TO BE A GOD», «ROADSIDE PICNIC», «ONE BILLION YEARS TO THE END OF THE WORLD»)

Keywords: Boris Strugatsky, Arkady Strugatsky, fiction, paradigm of thinking, Soviet literature, the future

Abstract

In the article, we made an attempt to demonstrate the understanding of the change in cultural and historical paradigms in the work of the Strugatsky brothers. The analysis of the main works of the writers: “Attempt to escape”, “It is difficult to be a god”, “Roadside picnic”, “A billion years before the end of the world” from the point of view of rethinking the paradigms of thinking. It is proved that each new era brings about new factors of perception of reality. The article focuses on the ability of the Strugatsky brothers to foresee future changes in society. In addition, a due place in the study is given to the mechanisms of motivational search, revealed in the models of the probable development of mankind. The elements of Soviet reality are analyzed, which add parallelism to the works of writers. The factors of consolidation of various elements of thinking in a clear structure of social life are considered. We pay special attention to the “truth of life”, which could only be partially demonstrated by the Strugatsky brothers (censorship restrictions). We have introduced excerpts from the autobiographical works of Sergei Dovlatov into the text of the article - with the help of these quotes, a more complete picture of Soviet reality is created. This reality allows us to build conditional constructs of the future, analyze the present and carry out a historical retrospection of the past. The focus of the research allows us to trace the shades of the emergence of freedom in the era of late “stagnation”, which was caused by the deepening of the systemic crisis in the USSR. The Strugatsky brothers worked fruitfully in the field of clarifying the “internal motivation of the Soviet man”. These studies found a lively response in Soviet society – the creativity of the writers was of a semi-democratic format, which was highly valued under the conditions of authoritarianism. It was thanks to this “status” that the writers managed to keep their works acceptable for the official press in the USSR and demonstrate in them the problems of society. In their creative evolution, the Strugatsky brothers moved away from the vulgar sociologization of their first works and made a real psychological breakthrough in understanding human existence, which partly does not lose its relevance in the 21st century they are describing. At the same time, the Strugatskys' reality often balances on the brink of absurdity, which allowed them to trace more deeply the mechanisms of “fate”.

References

Список використаної літератури:
1. Антонец В.А. Культурный смысл противостояния человека и тоталитарного общества. Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2012. №3 Сс. 243-245.
2. Братусь І.В. Протидія системи й антисистеми в повісті братів Стругацьких «Равлик на схилі». Українські культурологічні студії. 2021. №8. Сс. 5-9.
3. Братусь І.В., Свердлик З.М., Гунька А.М. Свобода та несвобода в повісті братів Стругацьких «За мільярд років до кінця світу». Молодий вчений. 2021 № 93. Сс. 226-230.
4. Бурцев Г.В., Казаков А.А. Интертекстуальный контекст рецепции Р. Д. Брэдбери в творчестве братьев А.Н. и Б.Н. Стругацких (литературная традиция Ф.М. Достоевского и Ф. Кафки). Наука о человеке: гуманитарные исследования. 2020. № 14. Сс. 19-29.
5. Гуриев С., Цывинский О. Ностальгировать по СССР не стоит.
URL:https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2009/10/13/nostalgirovat-po-sssr-ne-stoit
6. Довлатов С. Собрание прозы в четырех томах. Т. 2. Сергей Довлатов. Санкт-Петербург: Азбука, Азбука-Аттикус. 2017. 416 с.
7. Королькова П.В. К вопросу о разграничении фэнтези и литературной волшебной сказки. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 9. Филология. 2011.№ 1. Сс. 59-66.
8. Микешин М.И. Социальная метафизика братьев Стругацких. Вестник ЛГУ им. А.С. Пушкина. 2015. №4. Сс. 243-253.
9. Обвинцева О.В., Обвинцева Т.О. Репрезентация концепта наука в повести Аркадия и Бориса Стругацких «Пикник на обочине». Вестник Томского государственного педагогического университета. 2021. № 4. Сс. 91-99.
10. Стругацкий А., Стругацкий Б. Попытка к бегству. Трудно быть богом. Хищные вещи века. Москва: Текст, 1992. 415 с.
11. Тельпов Р.Е. Художественные функции имен собственных в повести братьев Стругацких «Улитка на склоне». Мир науки, культуры, образования. 2008. №1. Сс. 64-66.
12. Эвальд Васильевич Ильенков в воспоминаниях. Москва, РГГУ, 2004. 309 с.
References:
1. Antonets, V.A. (2012). Kulʹturnyy smysl protyvostoyanyya cheloveka y totalytarnoho obshchestva [The cultural meaning of the confrontation between man and totalitarian society]. Yaroslavskyy pedahohycheskyy vestnyk, 1, 3, 243-245 [in Russian]
2. Bratus, І.V. (2021). Protydiya systemy y antysystemy v povisti brativ Struhatsʹkykh “Ravlyk na skhyli” [Сounteraction of the system of antisystems in the life of the Strugatsky brothers “Sail on the slope”]. Ukrayinski kulturologichni studiyi, 8, 5-9 [in Ukrainian]
3. Bratus І.V.& Sverdlik Z.M. & Gun'ka A.M. (2021). Svoboda ta nesvoboda v povisti brativ Struhatsʹkykh “Za milʹyard rokiv do kintsya svitu” [Freedom and lack of freedom in the life of the Strugatsky brothers “For the billions of years until the end of the day”]. Molodiy Vchenii, 5, 226-230 [in Ukrainian]
4. Burtsev G. & Kazakov, A. (2020). Yntertekstualʹnyy kontekst retseptsyy R. D. Brédbery v tvorchestve bratʹev A.N. i B.N. Struhatskykh (lyteraturnaya tradytsyya F.M. Dostoevskoho i F. Kafky) [Intertextual context of RD Bradbury's reception in the works of brothers A.N. and B.N. Strugatsky (literary tradition of F.M. Dostoevsky and F. Kafka)]. Nauka o cheloveke: humanytarnye yssledovanyya, 1, 19-29 [in Russian]
5. Guriev, S. & Tsyvinsky, O. Nostalʹhyrovatʹ po SSSR ne stoyt [Nostalgic for the USSR is not worth]. Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2009/10/13/nostalgirovat-po-sssr-ne-stoit [in Russian]
6. Dovlatov, S. (2017). Sobraniye prozy v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 2. Sergey Dovlatov [Collected prose in four volumes. V. 2, Sergey Dovlatov]. Sainct-Petersburg: Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus [in Russian]
7. Korolkova, P.V. (2011). K voprosu o raz·hranychenyy féntezy y lyteraturnoy volshebnoy skazky [To the question of the delimitation of fantasy and literary fairy tale]. Vestnyk Moskovskoho unyversyteta. Seryya 9. Fylolohyya, 1, 59-66 [in Russian].
8. Mikeshin, M.I. (2015). Sotsyalʹnaya metafyzyka bratʹev Struhatskykh [Social metaphysics of the Strugatsky brothers]. Vestnyk LHU ym. A.S. Pushkyna, 243-253 [in Russian]
9. Obvintseva, O.V. & Obvintseva, T.O. (2021). Reprezentatsyya kontsepta nauka v povesty Arkadyya y Borysa Struhatskykh “Pyknyk na obochyne”. [Representation of the concept of science in the story of Arkady and Boris Strugatsky “Roadside Picnic”]. Vestnyk Tomskoho hosudarstvennoho pedahohycheskoho unyversyteta, 4, 91-99 [in Russian]
10. Strugatsky, A. & Strugatsky, B. (1992). Popytka k behstvu. Trudno bytʹ bohom. Khyshchnye veshchy veka [Attempt to escape. It's hard to be a god. Predatory things of the century] [in Russian]
11. Telpov, R.E. (2008). Khudozhestvennye funktsyy ymen sobstvennykh v povesty bratʹev Struhatskykh “Ulytka na sklone”. [Artistic functions of proper names in the story of the Strugatsky brothers “The snail on the slope”]. Myr nauky, kulʹtury, obrazovanyya, 1, 64-66 [in Russian
12. Évalʹd Vasylʹevych Ylʹenkov v vospomynanyyakh (2004) [Evald Vasilievich Ilyenkov in memoirs] [in Russian]
Published
2021-11-21
Section
CULTURALOGICAL STUDIES