MORPHOLOGY OF MAGIC TRICKS

Keywords: magic tricks, V.Ya. Propp, functions, morphology, G. Rodari, Propp cards

Abstract

It is considered in the article the possibility of a structural-typological description of magic tricks by their permanent structural elements, the relation of these elements to one another and to the whole. An analysis of the decomposition into component parts of magic tricks producing the main spectacular effects is given. Special attention is paid to the correspondence of the dedicated elements of the historical and cultural tradition of the comparative typological method of research. The probabilistic genesis of juggle is researched. The article demonstrates the practical application of the structuralist and historical-cultural methods proposed by V.Ya. Propp. The article is intended to form the theory of juggles, to eliminate the gaps existing in it. On the basis of fragmentary historical sources by the modeling cultural-historical processes method, a probabilistic version of the occurrence of juggle is proposed. Assessing the current social position of juggles as steadily non-criminal and the absence of any historical facts about the origin of juggles, as criminal practices, the article does not analyze an alternative version of the occurrence of juggles. From the standpoint of structuralism, an attempt to identify the structural patterns of juggle is made. The characteristic features of magic, especially its structure and process, are highlighted and described. In this article, magic is considered as a unity of mythological beliefs and ritual practices (mytho-ritual). Special attention is paid by the author to the status of the magician as a priority component of magic. Based on the study of magic, the author comes to the following conclusion: applied by magic, the techniques for maintaining the status of a magician, designated as profane practices devoid of sacred meaningfulness, separated from it during the decline of magic, formed a secular cultural phenomenon that was transformed into a cultural phenomenon called today juggles. The author sees confirmation of this version in the preservation of the semantic components in the juggles to this day – mythemes, magical ritual form and paraphernalia. Exploring the dynamics of cultural and historical processes from the standpoint of formalism, the author describes another phenomenon derived from myth – a fairy tale. The author claims that the presumed commonality of the juggles and fairy tales origin makes it possible to apply the methods of studying fairy tales to the study of tricks. The research method of fairy tales introduced by V.Ya. Propp in modern culture is recognized over genre. Based on this, the author conducts a structural analysis of foci using the method of V.Ya. Propp, aiming to establish the patterns of their structure. The article provides a detailed description of the action analysis of the characters and the juggles events, divided into groups according to the spectacular effect produced. In the research process in each focus, it was possible to establish repetitive uniform stable elements and give them a content specific to the genre of focuses. The number of characters in all the studied focuses was also the same. The analysis result generalization showed the structural uniformity of a wide variety of foci, which allowed the author to draw an informed conclusion about the structural uniformity of foci and establish a structuralistic definition of focus. In this study important is the preservation of the traditional generally accepted intergenre names of the selected elements, which keeps the focuses theory within the framework of general cultural notions. According to common practice, the stable elements highlighted in juggle were visualized. Images are given in the annex to the article. The establishment of the juggles structure uniformity and the production of focal “Propp cards” allows us to confidently assume their practical application.

References

Список использованной литературы:
1. Айдаров П. Иллюзионист и его номер. Иллюзионный жанр как искусство. Екатеринбург: Rideró, 2021. 335 с.
2. Вадимов А., Тривас М.«От магов древности до иллюзионистов наших дней. Москва: «Искусство», 1966. 82 с.
3. Джеймс В. Многообразие религиозного опыта. Санкт- Петербург: Андреев и сыновья, 1993. 418 с.
4. Едошина И. Миф, мифологема, мифема в контексте деятельностного подхода к феноменам культуры. Вестник Вятского государственного университета. 2009. Т.1. Вып. 3. Сс. 79-81.
5. Заславская А. Методические рекомендации по построению циркового номера. Челябинск: Муниципальное бюджетное учреждение дополнительного образования «Центр внешкольной работы г. Челябинска», 2019. 12 с.
6. Зомонов М. Концепты шаманизма: семиотико-компаративистский подход. Санкт-Петербург: Санкт Петербургское философское общество, 2010. 222 с.
7. Карташкин А. Фокусы. Занимательная энциклопедия. Москва: «Издательский дом «Искатель», 1997. 544 с.
8. Карташкин А. Цветы сквозь асфальт.
URL:http://magicpedia.ru/%D0%9A%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B8/tabid/533/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/631/--.aspx
9. Клюкина Л. Мифема и мифологема: практики использования понятия в современной отечественной философии культуры. Санкт-Петербург: Международный журнал исследователей культуры, 2018. Cс. 197-208.
10. Красников А. Методология классического религиоведения. Благовещенск: Библиотека журнала «Религиоведение», 2004. 148 с.
11. Кэмпбелл Д. Тысячеликий герой. Киев: «Terra Incognita», 2020. 416 с.
12. Леви-Брюль Л. Сверхъестественное в первобытном мышлении. Москва: «Педагокика-пресс», 1994. 607 с.
13. Леви-Стросс К. Первобытное мышление. Москва: «Республика», 1994. 384 с.
14. Леви-Строс К. Структура и форма. Размышления над одной работой Владимира Проппа. Москва: Зарубежные исследования по семиотике фольклора, 1985. Сс. 121-152.
15. Лубский В., Лубская М. История религий. Учебник. Киев: Центр учебной литературы, 2004. 696 с.
16. Малиновский Б. Магия, наука и религия. Москва: Рефл-бук, 1998. 304 с.
17. Пропп В. Морфология волшебной сказки. Москва: Лабиринт, 1998. 512 с.
18. Пропп В. Исторические корни волшебной сказки. Москва: издательская группа «Азбука-Аттикус», 2020. 544 с.
19. Плахова О. Отражение естественной среды обитания человека в сказочной картине мира.
URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/otrazhenie-estestvennoy-sredy-obitaniya-cheloveka-v-skazochnoy-kartine-mira/viewer
20. Родари Дж. Грамматика фантазии. Введение в искусство придумывания историй. Москва: Прогресс, 1990. 192 с.
21. Романов К. Магические действия в структуре традиционной психологической культуры мордовского народа. Финно-угорский мир. 2017. №1. Сс. 116-123.
22. Свечников В. Теория и практика сценической магии. Саратов: Саратовский государственный технический университет, 1998. 301 с.
23. Смиренский В. Формула тайны. Модели сюжетных структур и нарративного интеллекта. Дискурс, речь, речевая деятельность. Москва: ИНИОН РАН, 2000. Сс. 181-211.
24. Тайлор Э. Первобытная культура. Москва: Госсоцэкониздат, 1939. 567 с.
25. Фрэзер Дж. Золотая ветвь. Новые плоды. Москва: Академический проект, 2019. 407 с.
26. Фрэзер Дж. Золотая ветвь: исследование магии и религии. Москва: Политиздат, 1986. 832 с.
27. Фрейд З. Тотем и табу. Харьков: Фолио, 2009. 110 с.
28. Фромм Э. Психоанализ и религия. Сумерки богов. Москва: Политиздат, 1990. 398 с.
References:
1. Ajdarov, P. (2021). Illyuzionist i ego nomer. Illyuzionnyj zhanr kak iskusstvo [The illusionist and his act. Illusion genre as art]. Ekaterinburg: Rideró [in Russian]
2. Vadimov, A. & Trivas, M. (1966). Ot magov drevnosti do illyuzionistov nashih dnej [From ancient sorcerers to modern day illusionists]. Moscow: Iskusstvo [in Russian]
3. Dzhejms, V. (1993). Mnogoobrazie religioznogo opyta [Variety of religious experiences]. Sanct-Petersburg: Andreev i synov'ya [in Russian]
4. Edoshina, I. (2009). Mif, mifologema, mifema v kontekste deyatel'nostnogo podhoda k fenomenam kul'tury [Myth, mythologeme, miteme in the context of an activity approach to cultural phenomena]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [in Russian]
5. Zaslavskaya, A. (2019). Metodicheskie rekomendacii po postroeniyu cirkovogo nomera [Methodological recommendations for the construction of a circus number]. Chelyabinsk: Municipal'noe byudzhetnoe uchrezhdenie dopolnitel'nogo obrazovaniya “Centr vneshkol'noj raboty g. CHelyabinska” [in Russian]
6. Zomonov, M. (2010). Koncepty shamanizma: semiotiko-komparativistskij podhod [Concepts of shamanism: semiotic-comparative approach]. Sanct-Petersburg: Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo [in Russian]
7. Kartashkin, A. (1997). Fokusy. Zanimatel'naya enciklopediya [Magic tricks. Entertaining encyclopedia]. Moscow: Izdatel'skij dom “Iskatel'” [in Russian]
8. Kartashkin, A. (2013). Cvety skvoz' asfal't [Flowers through thе asphalt]
URL:http://magicpedia.ru/%D0%9A%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%B8/tabid/533/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/631/--.aspx [in Russian]
9. Kempbell, D. (2020). Tysyachelikij geroj [The Hero with a Thousand Faces]. Kiev: Terra Incognita [in Ukrainian]
10. Klyukina, L. (2018). Mifema i mifologema: praktiki ispol'zovaniya ponyatiya v sovremennoj otechestvennoj filosofii kul'tury [Mypheme and mythologeme: the practice of using the concept in modern Russian philosophy of culture]. Sanct-Petersburg: Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal issledovatelej kul'tury [in Russian]
11. Krasnikov, A. (2004). Metodologiya klassicheskogo religiovedeniya [Methodology of classical religious studies]. Blagoveshchensk: Biblioteka zhurnala “Religiovedenie” [in Russian]
12. Levi-Bryul', L. (1994). Sverh"estestvennoe v pervobytnom myshlenii [Le surnaturel et la nature dans la mentalité primitive]. Moscow: Pedagokika-press [in Russian]
13. Levi-Stross, K. (1994). Pervobytnoe myshlenie [Рrimal thinking]. Moscow: Respublika [in Russian]
14. Levi-Stros, K. (1985). Struktura i forma. Razmyshleniya nad odnoj rabotoj Vladimira Proppa [Structure and form. Reflections on one work of Vladimir Propp]. Moscow: Zarubezhnye issledovaniya po semiotike fol'klora [in Russian]
15. Lubskij, V. & Lubskaya, M. (2004). Istoriya religij [Нistory of religion]. Kiev: Centr uchebnoj literatury [in Ukrainian]
16. Malinovskij, B. (1998). Magiya, nauka i religiya [Magic, science and religion]. Moscow: Refl-buk [in Russian]
17. Propp, V. (1998). Morfologiya volshebnoj skazki [Morphology of the Folktale]. Moscow: Labirint [in Russian]
18. Propp, V. (2020) «storicheskie korni volshebnoj skazki [The historical roots of the fairy tale]. Moscow: izdatel'skaya gruppa “Azbuka-Attikus” [in Russian]
19. Plahova, O. (2011). Otrazhenie estestvennoj sredy obitaniya cheloveka v skazochnoj kartine mira [Reflection of the natural habitat of man in the fabulous picture of the world]. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [in Russian]
20. Rodari, D. (1990). Grammatika fantazii. Vvedenie v iskusstvo pridumyvaniya istorij [Fantasy grammar. An introduction to the art of making stories]. Moscow: Progress [in Russian]
21. Romanov, K. (2017). Magicheskie dejstviya v strukture tradicionnoj psihologicheskoj kul'tury mordovskogo naroda [Magical actions in the structure of the traditional psychological culture of the Mordovian people]. Finno-ugorskij mir, 1, 116-123 [in Russian]
22. Svechnikov, V. (1998). Teoriya i praktika scenicheskoj magii [Theory and Practice of Stage Magic]. Saratov: Saratovskij gosudarstvennyj tekhnicheskij universitet [in Russian]
23. Smirenskij, V. (2011). Formula tajny. Modeli syuzhetnyh struktur i narrativnogo intellekta [The formula of the mystery. Models of plot structures and narrative intelligence]. Diskurs, rech', rechevaya deyatel'nost'. Moscow: Inion Ran, 181-211 [in Russian]
24. Tajlor, E. (1939). Pervobytnaya kul'tura [Primitive culture]. Moscow: Gossocekonizdat [in Russian]
25. Frezer, Dzh. (2019). Zolotaya vetv'. Novye plody [The Golden Bough. New fetus]. Moscow: Akademicheskij proekt [in Russian]
26. Frezer, Dzh. (1986). Zolotaya vetv': issledovanie magii i religii [The Golden Bough: a study of magic and Religion]. Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian]
27. Frejd, Z. (2009). Totem i tabu [Totem and taboo]. Kharkiv: Folio [in Ukrainian]
28. Fromm, E. (1990). Psihoanaliz i religiya [Psychoanalysis and Religion]. Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian]
Published
2021-11-21
Section
CULTURALOGICAL STUDIES