From trick assemblage to narrative scoring in aerial gymnastics: genre evolution and dramaturgical consolidation

  • Kristina POTOPALSKA
Keywords: aerial gymnastics, contemporary circus, dramaturgy, narrative scoring, apparatus–body misfit, immersive performance, physical profiling, injury risk, gendered aesthetics, rehearsal design

Abstract

The article analyzes the contemporary reconfiguration of aerial gymnastics from feat-centered concatenations to dramaturgically scored compositions in which technique carries narrative meaning. Building on recent work in circus dramaturgy, choreographic method, audience physiology, performer profiling, and injury-risk synthesis, the study argues that recurrent motive families – wraps, climbs, drops, and suspensions – can be organized as image-bearing structures without diluting gymnastic specificity. Compositional agency is attributed to the material frictions between body and apparatus: torsion, drag, deliberate mis/fit, negotiated balance. These frictions are arranged through repetition-with-difference, durational suspensions, and tempo-coded transitions so that conflict, hesitation, and repair unfold as legible arcs rather than as ornamental bridges between highlight tricks. Audience-side measurements from immersive formats indicate segment-wise peaks of synchrony at dramaturgical hinges, providing a feedback-sensitive handle on pacing, cue placement, and the distribution of suspense and release. In parallel, cross-sectional profiles of pre-professional and professional circus artists, together with discipline-specific risk syntheses and return-to-performance pathways, supply operational constraints for casting, rehearsal design, and spacing of high-load elements; narrative intensity is matched to tissue tolerance, prior exposure, and recovery windows. The article proposes a practice-oriented matrix that links motive selection to compositional choices, health parameters, and audience cues, and illustrates its applicability by reading a Jeanne d’Arc creation as a cyclical motive design built from bindings, ascents, and falls. Outcomes include criteria for distributing serial drops and prolonged isometrics across an arc; guidelines for integrating breath, tremor, and micro-failure as evidence rather than defect; and a template for returning motif density when re-staging for different bodies while preserving the same narrative outline. The consolidation of these methods clarifies how risk, virtuosity, and imbalance/repair operate as circus-specific codes of meaning. Taken together, the framework supplies creators and coaches with reproducible procedures for narrative scoring in contemporary aerial work, enabling genre evolution from trick assemblage to image-driven storytelling while sustaining performer longevity and dramaturgical clarity.

References

1. Cossin, M., Rodet, H., Guest, P., Mallet, É., Blain-Moraes, S., & Kuhlmann, N. (2025). Physiological measures of audience engagement and interpersonal synchrony during an immersive participatory performance. Circus: Arts, Life, and Sciences, 4(1) [in English].
2. Franziska Trapp. (2024). Readings of contemporary circus: A dramaturgy. Routledge. Available at: https://surl.li/wbthiz [in English].
3. Greenspan, S. J., & Stuckey, M. I. (2024). Preparation for flight: The physical profile of pre-professional and professional circus artists in the United States. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy, 19(5), 591-608 [in English].
4. Greenspan, S., & Stuckey, M. I. (2023). Untangling risk factors including discipline-specific exposure for injuries in preprofessional and professional circus artists in the USA. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 9, e001551 [in English].
5. Martinez, L. V. (2024). “That’s what makes somebody circus”: The collaborative process of transforming the meaning of pain through discourse in circus organizations. Circus: Arts, Life, and Sciences, 3(1) [in English].
6. McBlaine, T., & Davies, B. L. (2023). Exploratory characterization of injury in recreational aerial circus arts. Circus: Arts, Life, and Sciences, 2(1) [in English].
7. Munro, D., Greenspan, S., Nicholas, J., & Stuckey, M. I. (2025). Circus-specific extension of the 6th International Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 11(2), e002524 [in English].
8. Richard, V., Cairney, J., & Woods, C. T. (2023). Holding open spaces to explore beyond: Toward a different conceptualization of specialization in high-performance sport. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1089264 [in English].
9. Stich, E. (2024). A choreographic method of mis/fit in aerial dance. Choreographic Practices, 15, 243-264 [in English].
10. Watt, C. (2022). Social circus in aerials: Female experience, muscularity, pain and trust. Theatre, Dance and Performance Training, 13(1), 136-152 [in English].
Published
2026-02-01
Section
CULTURALOGICAL STUDIES